No sabemos si algún día se llegará a la verdad última del suicidio de Nisman. Pero por cómo viene la mano, esto va a pasar de largo, como lo de Redrado hace algunos veranos. Meter la mano en la mierda y establecer una solución que, en definitiva, es popular, democrática y republicana. Cierto que es tarde, pero en definitiva así ha sido el kirchnerismo. Únicamente cuando las papas queman y junta consenso como para que la única salida sea justamente en el sentido que decíamos.
Lo de Nisman es muy pobre, a pesar de los informes que se confunden con sueños húmedos de una primavera árabe en Latinoamérica.
En 10 años no hizo un pomo, y esto le ha costado al gobierno prestigio político. Ahora que empiezan a aparecer más datos, vemos que no es la primera vez que este malogrado (idiota útil?) fiscal sigue el libreto de algún servicio de inteligencia. Acá, su actuación lamentable en el caso de los fusilamientos, torturas y desapariciones en La Tablada.
Además, Cristina sacó de encima a los intermediarios, las conducciones de la DAIA y la AMIA, que parecen seguir nostálgicos de Beraja y el menemismo. Al recibirlos en Olivos, Cristina toma contacto directo con los principales interesados.
Las conducciones de la DAIA y la AMIA se representan a sí mismas, con lo que ello implica en la supuesta búsqueda de Justicia para las victimas. Parecen de nuevo estar muy satisfechos siguiendo el libreto de afuera. Tal vez eso explique cómo en diez años, y según propias declaraciones, de que se reunían a diario con Nisman... para terminar acusando a Cristina, el Cuervo Larroque, Timerman, D'Elía y Fernandito Esteche. O sea, errándole feo al tacho. No vamos a hacer la historia del caso, que tan brillantemente Cristina resumió en su facebook. Ni de la obvia estupidez de la acusación a los otros.
Es bien conocido el antisemitismo de D'Elía, y el antiisraelismo de Fernandito Esteche, además de la obvia relación con Irán. Pero opinar es un derecho constitucional, y emitir una opinión no es un delito, por más que no nos guste. Eso es todo.
Pensar que no se siguió la pista siria, que parece tener vericuetos que salpican a unos cuantos de aquí. Hay tipos, de relación familiar con el ex presidente Méndez, que hicieron cosas raras en aquellos días, así como unos cuantos bonaerenses y federales.
Pero parece que las conducciones de AMIA, DAIA, y del Estado de Israel no están interesados en historias viejas. Al menos, Israel vive el presente, y lo que importa es lo que viene, no lo que pasó. Pena, por aquel estado que encontró y juzgó a Eichmann, abriendo una esperanza mundial de que los derechos humanos son universales, y la justicia puede intentar reparar.
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Timerman. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Timerman. Mostrar todas las entradas
martes, 27 de enero de 2015
jueves, 6 de marzo de 2014
Jacobo Timerman, sobre Lanata
Extraído de una nota con Graciela Mochkofski, en El puercoespín
"-No. Eso no es investigar. Eso es espiar. Confunden. El trabajo de periodista está bien definido, y eso es lo que hay que hacer. Todas esas cámaras ocultas, locuras, todo ese periodismo… Jorge Lanata es abominable. Porque excita al lector, lo manosea, lo marea, pero no aparece nada. Hace poco anunciaron: “Mañana en el programa Día D hemos descubierto el refugio de Monetta”. Es interesante. ¡Además Monetta, tanto anunciarlo como para que se vaya! Me llamó la atención.
-¿Y qué pasó?
-Recorrieron algunos lugares donde Monetta había vivido alguna vez.
-Eso es embaucar al espectador.
-Hay mucho de eso en los diarios, en todos lados, hay muchísimo. Todos los días, es permanente.
-Aparte Lanata tiene un tema con Moneta.
-Pero muy bien. No importa que esté obsesionado. Pero mintió. Esa es la base de todo. Mintió…"
"-No. Eso no es investigar. Eso es espiar. Confunden. El trabajo de periodista está bien definido, y eso es lo que hay que hacer. Todas esas cámaras ocultas, locuras, todo ese periodismo… Jorge Lanata es abominable. Porque excita al lector, lo manosea, lo marea, pero no aparece nada. Hace poco anunciaron: “Mañana en el programa Día D hemos descubierto el refugio de Monetta”. Es interesante. ¡Además Monetta, tanto anunciarlo como para que se vaya! Me llamó la atención.
-¿Y qué pasó?
-Recorrieron algunos lugares donde Monetta había vivido alguna vez.
-Eso es embaucar al espectador.
-Hay mucho de eso en los diarios, en todos lados, hay muchísimo. Todos los días, es permanente.
-Aparte Lanata tiene un tema con Moneta.
-Pero muy bien. No importa que esté obsesionado. Pero mintió. Esa es la base de todo. Mintió…"
miércoles, 6 de febrero de 2013
Timerman poniéndole los puntos al gobierno derechista de Israel
Lo mando en el inglés original. Es la nota del Haaretz sobre la discusión acalorada que hubo entre Timerman y la ministra de Relaciones Exteriores del gobierno derechista de Israel.
Resultado, la calzó bien calzada. Bien por Timerman
Argentine foreign minister accuses Israel of giving 'ammunition to anti-Semites,' sources say
Hector Timerman's remarks were made during a dressing down of Israel's envoy Dorit Shavit, after Israel tried to get explanation about the Argentina-Iran agreement to create a 'truth commission' to investigate the 1994 bombing of a Buenos Aires Jewish center.
By Barak Ravid | Feb.06, 2013 | 3:00 AM | 10
Argentine Foreign Minister Hector Timerman accused Israel of giving "ammunition to anti-Semites who accuse Jews of dual loyalty" as part of an exceptionally harsh dressing down of Israel's ambassador Dorit Shavit, sources say.
The incident was sparked by Israel's efforts to obtain explanations about an agreement Argentina and Iran signed around two weeks ago.
The agreement creates a "truth commission" to investigate the 1994 bombing of AMIA, the Jewish community center in Buenos Aires.
When Israel learned of the agreement, the Israeli Foreign Ministry summoned the Argentine ambassador for a reprimand, during which the ministry's deputy director general for Latin America, Itzhak Shoham, objected to the deal and demanded explanations.
The Argentines were furious, and in response, Timerman summoned Shavit for a reprimand on January 31.
According to Foreign Ministry sources who saw Shavit's account of the meeting, Timerman was "upset and really angry" that Israel had demanded explanations of the Argentine ambassador. He apparently launched into a long monologue in which he assailed Israel for intervening in Argentina's internal affairs and even charged that such behavior encourages anti-Semitism. Shavit was barely able to utter a word in response, as he cut her off repeatedly, according to sources.
"Israel has no right to demand explanations; we're a sovereign state," Timerman reportedly told her. "Israel doesn't speak in the name of the Jewish people and doesn't represent it. Jews who wanted or want to live in Israel moved there, and they are its citizens; those who live in Argentina are Argentine citizens. The attack was against Argentina, and Israel's desire to be involved in the issue only gives ammunition to anti-Semites who accuse Jews of dual loyalty."
Summoning the Argentine ambassador and then leaking the fact to the media was unacceptable behavior, he apparently continued. "Argentina doesn't summon the Israeli ambassador for explanations. If we wanted to, we could summon you here twice a month to demand explanations about a military operation in Gaza or construction in the settlements. But we don't do that, because we don't want to intervene in your sovereign decisions."
Shavit responded angrily, according to sources. "As the Jewish state, Israel views itself as responsible to some degree for the welfare of [all] Jews and tracks anti-Semitism worldwide," she reportedly told Timerman. "Therefore, it helped Jews leave the Soviet Union, brought Jews from Ethiopia and, at times, also helped Jews in Argentina. You surely know what I'm talking about," she apparently added, referring to Timerman's own family history.
In the 1980s, Timerman's father, himself a Jew, was arrested by the right-wing military junta then running the country because he was a journalist who supported the left. He was held in prison in solitary confinement, but was finally released due to the intervention of the Israeli ambassador to Argentina and his staff - some of whom are today senior Foreign Ministry officials. They reached a secret deal with the junta under which Timerman's father would be allowed to leave the country. He moved to Israel for a few years, but returned to Argentina once the junta fell.
Shavit reportedly stressed that Israel wasn't trying to intervene in Argentina's decisions, but it did want explanations, due to the similarity between the AMIA bombing and an attack on the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires two years earlier. The Argentine police and security agencies believe that Iran and Hezbollah were behind both bombings. Nevertheless, Timerman decided to play dumb, according to sources.
"I don't know if there's any connection between the two attacks," he apparently said. "If Israel has any such information, I ask that you give it to us as a soon as possible."
But despite the angry tone of the meeting, Foreign Ministry officials said it ended with Timerman and Shavit agreeing that both sides should try to lower the flames and continue the discussion via quiet diplomatic channels.
Resultado, la calzó bien calzada. Bien por Timerman
Argentine foreign minister accuses Israel of giving 'ammunition to anti-Semites,' sources say
Hector Timerman's remarks were made during a dressing down of Israel's envoy Dorit Shavit, after Israel tried to get explanation about the Argentina-Iran agreement to create a 'truth commission' to investigate the 1994 bombing of a Buenos Aires Jewish center.
By Barak Ravid | Feb.06, 2013 | 3:00 AM | 10
Argentine Foreign Minister Hector Timerman accused Israel of giving "ammunition to anti-Semites who accuse Jews of dual loyalty" as part of an exceptionally harsh dressing down of Israel's ambassador Dorit Shavit, sources say.
The incident was sparked by Israel's efforts to obtain explanations about an agreement Argentina and Iran signed around two weeks ago.
The agreement creates a "truth commission" to investigate the 1994 bombing of AMIA, the Jewish community center in Buenos Aires.
When Israel learned of the agreement, the Israeli Foreign Ministry summoned the Argentine ambassador for a reprimand, during which the ministry's deputy director general for Latin America, Itzhak Shoham, objected to the deal and demanded explanations.
The Argentines were furious, and in response, Timerman summoned Shavit for a reprimand on January 31.
According to Foreign Ministry sources who saw Shavit's account of the meeting, Timerman was "upset and really angry" that Israel had demanded explanations of the Argentine ambassador. He apparently launched into a long monologue in which he assailed Israel for intervening in Argentina's internal affairs and even charged that such behavior encourages anti-Semitism. Shavit was barely able to utter a word in response, as he cut her off repeatedly, according to sources.
"Israel has no right to demand explanations; we're a sovereign state," Timerman reportedly told her. "Israel doesn't speak in the name of the Jewish people and doesn't represent it. Jews who wanted or want to live in Israel moved there, and they are its citizens; those who live in Argentina are Argentine citizens. The attack was against Argentina, and Israel's desire to be involved in the issue only gives ammunition to anti-Semites who accuse Jews of dual loyalty."
Summoning the Argentine ambassador and then leaking the fact to the media was unacceptable behavior, he apparently continued. "Argentina doesn't summon the Israeli ambassador for explanations. If we wanted to, we could summon you here twice a month to demand explanations about a military operation in Gaza or construction in the settlements. But we don't do that, because we don't want to intervene in your sovereign decisions."
Shavit responded angrily, according to sources. "As the Jewish state, Israel views itself as responsible to some degree for the welfare of [all] Jews and tracks anti-Semitism worldwide," she reportedly told Timerman. "Therefore, it helped Jews leave the Soviet Union, brought Jews from Ethiopia and, at times, also helped Jews in Argentina. You surely know what I'm talking about," she apparently added, referring to Timerman's own family history.
In the 1980s, Timerman's father, himself a Jew, was arrested by the right-wing military junta then running the country because he was a journalist who supported the left. He was held in prison in solitary confinement, but was finally released due to the intervention of the Israeli ambassador to Argentina and his staff - some of whom are today senior Foreign Ministry officials. They reached a secret deal with the junta under which Timerman's father would be allowed to leave the country. He moved to Israel for a few years, but returned to Argentina once the junta fell.
Shavit reportedly stressed that Israel wasn't trying to intervene in Argentina's decisions, but it did want explanations, due to the similarity between the AMIA bombing and an attack on the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires two years earlier. The Argentine police and security agencies believe that Iran and Hezbollah were behind both bombings. Nevertheless, Timerman decided to play dumb, according to sources.
"I don't know if there's any connection between the two attacks," he apparently said. "If Israel has any such information, I ask that you give it to us as a soon as possible."
But despite the angry tone of the meeting, Foreign Ministry officials said it ended with Timerman and Shavit agreeing that both sides should try to lower the flames and continue the discussion via quiet diplomatic channels.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)